Wedding Forums and Motivation

WEDDING FORUMS

Boards address specific, sometimes frivolous subjects, many times over, ad nauseam.  In many cases with answers having no bearing whatsoever to the specific question as it is posed or how it affects the asker. 

We all suffer from Demographic Dyslexia. Differing opinions and responses formed because of differences in tradition, ethnicity, location, experience, education, training, etc.  So we get answers on different subjects to our perceived problems and then we act upon them upon the advice of someone who… is not us…

The topic that blows me off the most is the ‘Second shooter”. The whole concept of a second shooter only came about with PJ and somewhat of an increased and sometimes worthless, self imposed workload. Somehow we went from 120-180 good shots on film to one who shoots 3500 images shot in an epic Cecil B. DeMille size program. If I went to someone’s house and sat through 3500 images of a wedding, I would probably leave right after I got a headache, or some other form of illness.  More bragging rights for the shooter than common sense would dictate you would hand a bride.

In the pre digital days when you sweated each wedding to know if you got image… a big wedding, called for a helper, AKA a schlep, a loader, an assistant, the hired help. This is what you get paid, that’s the end of discussion. You load, I shoot. In a year, I give you a shot at things.  First prove your loyalty and value to me. One of the differences was he worked full time for me.  Today some shooters at one wedding per month can’t afford paying someone for forty hours a week plus comp and overtime.  Some can’t afford to pay themselves.

 

Some information is as frivolous as the question:

You see with so many newbies on forums, at least a very high percentage of the information comes from those with under X amounts of weddings. These may be low timers, haven’t realized yet the agony of defeat. I call it the luck roll. Three weddings and they self proclaim themselves a PRO. Maybe. Got to respect that word PRO. It’s popular,  it’s on every cheap Chinese knockoff imported gadget made.

Copy all the things a pro does, and officially that makes you a pro. Walks like a duck, talks like a duck, thus you might be a duck.  Then your camera dies at a wedding,  you know nothing about film or backups, and praying that Wal-mart is open and you can buy a Rebel or D50 10PM at night.  It just happens that this isn’t your bother in laws freebie and her Daddy is an Attorney. You are a duck all right, a dead duck. I know one guy this happened to.

What you can learn from the pro who is willing to teach you, is the art of CONTROL at the Wedding. Doing what others do is the tip of the iceberg; handling years of mistakes and problems that arise separates the wheat from the chaff. 

And a good pro will teach you how to work with lighting, working on putting the Wedding books together.  Most forums don’t get down to the basics os good business and those tools.

Sometimes you have to endure really dumb stuff.

Excuse me but the strongest questions I usually see on most forums concerns light. Stuff like “where do I plug my Fugazi Strobe that I just ordered into ”. And can you send samples of your pictures you shot because it's just like mine.  Like the shots taken thousands of miles apart at a different time, weather conditions, lighting, etc will have something in common. Too stupid to comment on. About as dumb as What F-stop did you use?

PICTURE CRITIQUEING

What do you do when someone asks for a critique of their photo? Maybe, just maybe, the answer to this quandary is quite simple but being mortal we look to our parents and at our upbringing. We were always told to "tell the truth even if it hurts".

So the problem doesn't lie with the pictures, nor the critique, it lies with US. We don't want to paint ourselves as being the bad guy in front of others. We don't want to criticize someone else’s pleasure, dream, world, creation, inspiration, manipulation or imagination but we have the choices to make. Follow what our parents taught us or just lie…of course its a little white lie and not perjury.

So the compliments are understandable. Almost every picture is wonderful and possibly a small correction would make it perfect but that is the usual extent of the strangers critique. 

It’s a religious thing…The Twelfth Commandment. "Thou shalt not bust another’s bubble". The Eleventh? “Learn to laugh at thyself, you might just be hilarious”.  Maybe the best bet is to respond with the following before or preclude your opinion with something like this.

SUGGESTED LEAD LETTERS 

"It's only professional to respond with the truth about the work you presented to this group" . Photography is about as diverse as the universe. You ask to be judged by those with differing opinions as to concept, quality, artisticness reality, message, lighting, composition, subject matter, position, and movement. Compliments may be either positive or negative and it is nothing personal. It is just one persons opinion."

-OR-

Concerning judging your work. Be it known that most forum or internet groups consist of semi -  professional photographers, advanced amateurs, budding alcoholic enthusiasts and a large congregation of dorks and weirdo's with differing skills and backgrounds some known to the FBI. 

Thus opinions and estimations will differ even those that are semi-coherant.  If they didn't this would be an awful dull place. Like most large families, squabbles and beliefs run hand in hand, sometimes right off the end of a cliff. But the next day all is forgotten because no one really gives a shit".


CONCLUSION
The negativity on some forums is so bad; I actually find it emotionally disconcerting.  Cowards like to hide behind anonymous names. Some folks will never grow up and some folks embarking on something new get discouraged too easily. Just an aberration of the web, sites turn that way.  BUT with that said the failure of some of the Usenet photo sites if any of you remember the battles, threats, a few actual law-suits and black-eyes when some egos followed up on things .

One thing I will say about the contributors is while there are raging debates  concerning equipment, everyone seems really positive when they make comments about other people's posted photography. There are certainly criticisms, but they are all well-intentioned and respectful.  


SOME RECOMMENDED COMMENTS:

1- I saw your work,  I guess doing portrait work for the Ukrainian Police Department really was good experience. You’ll have to work on getting nicer smiles though and a few wooden teeth might help.

2- I saw your work hanging in the Louve in Paris. Nice touch, stapling it to the body of the guy who hung himself....

3- I just received some of your pictures, just wondering were they meant for me or if you missed the delete key?

4- Your work is outstanding. It's raining heavy here and I have it OUT standing in the rain.

5- Your work is a breath of fresh air... in a garlic factory. No one will notice it....

6- The workers in the salt mines really appreciated the contribution of photographs you made. They really spruced up the caverns and the Gulags ….

7- Gosh, why did you wait so long, the magazine that prints this stuff went out of business?

8- It's not what you say, it's how you say it! Yaaahhhggghhh-poooooey!

9- Work like this is an inspiration to everyone who thought of cutting their ear off.

10- What colors in your photos, you were serious about that job offer at CRAYOLA

11- Your work exemplifies the meaning of “starving artist”.

 

 

copyright aljacobs 2101